Showing posts with label INTERVIEWS: Publishers/Editors. Show all posts
Showing posts with label INTERVIEWS: Publishers/Editors. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

Entry # 227 - Breadloaf - 2014 Notes from Julie Wakeman-Linn

By Jan Bowman

BreadloafIn my previous Entry # 226 – Interview with Julie Wakeman-Linn, we spoke mostly about her experiences as an Editor of the Potomac Review. Today my blog entry presents a post she shared with me – written about Breadloaf Conference on day four in August 2014.

Jan:  In August you returned for the third time to the Breadloaf Conference. Please tell us about your experiences there. Who taught your workshop and who impressed you in the craft talks. What new things did you discover about your own writing?

Julie:    Ursula Hegi, who is amazing, taught me a lot about point of entry into fiction. Andrea Barrett gave an incredible craft talk on Point of View.  And as for my own writing? Breadloaf is so much fun but it also gave me a nice shot of confidence in my work. It is a competitive admission conference and being there makes a writer feel good. Being surrounded by other serious and talented writers leads to marvelous conversations about the writing life, too.

Julie's  Blog Notes from Day Four – Breadloaf Writers Conference – 2014   
 

Vermont, whether cold and rainy or sunny and balmy, is beautiful. The mountains around us soothe. I am always optimistic but somehow it seems people check their egos at the bottom of the mountain before they come up. The US Poet laureate asked my table of regular writers, if she could join us. She was lovely, by the way. There is a flood of hope for opportunities, a sharing of information and don’t get me started on the swapping of books-essays-poems-you must read. I think only at end of semester English Major parties or in grad school after the killer comprehensives do you participate in such a sharing of ‘you must read this.

I’m studying with Ursula Hegi, an incredible writer and teacher. The workshop leaders’ credentials are too extensive to list here. Check out the conference website for that. The workshop group of ten is acting like old friends, although we’ve only been together 4 days. Certainly it is a competitive admission conference and even within that there are hierarchies—the talented hard working waiters are here on full scholarship. The Scholars have been granted the competitive tuition scholarships and our Fellows selected for their publication records and awards. I’m here as a participant. I’m lucky because my college foots my bills as professional development so I’ve never even applied for a scholarship and that probably takes away any concern I have about who is who.

hegi_cropped ======================================
Ursula Hegi is a bi-cultural writer who has published twelve books. Her Burgdorf Cycle encompasses Stones from the River, Floating in My Mother’s Palm, The Vision of Emma Blau, and Children and Fire. Hegi’s work has been translated into many languages. Her awards include the Italian Grinzane Cavour prize, a National Endowment for the Arts Fellowship, and the PEN/Faulkner Award. She is on the MFA faculty at Stony Brook Southampton. She has also taught at Barnard College and at the University of California at Irvine. She has served as a juror for the National Book Award and the National Book Critics Circle Award.       
online search website link:   Ursula Hegi
barrett_andreaphoto_9526 
Andrea Barrett is the author of six novels, most recently The Air We Breathe, and three collections of short fiction, Ship Fever, which received the National Book Award; Servants of the Map, a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize; and Archangel, which was published in 2013. She has received fellowships from the MacArthur Foundation,  the New York Public Library’s Cullman Center for Scholars and Writers, the Guggenheim Foundation, and the National Endowment for the Arts. She lives in western Massachusetts and teaches at Williams College.  search online or go to website:     http://andrea-barrett.com
PotomacReview 
Julie says: As Potomac Review editor, I am looking among the scholarship writers for likely contributors to the next issue.
In a way, I’m here as triple threat– writer, editor and friend. Yes, I also come to be with writer friends and study with them. So it’s day four of another great year at Breadloaf, although it is the coldest of the three times I’ve been here.  Here’s contact information if someone wants to follow up with me about writing, my work and the Potomac Review.
 


Friday, September 26, 2014

Entry #226 - Interview with Julie Wakeman-Linn, Editor of the Potomac Review

Julie Wakeman-Linn, Editor of Potomac Review answers questions about the joys & sorrows of editing a literary journal and my next post (Entry #227) will share more details of her experiences at the Breadloaf Workshop.

Jan:   Eli Flam founded the Potomac Review back in 1993. How has the Potomac Review changed since those early days and what do you see as the current mission?
Julie:   Our mission is very different. Eli published quarterly and only accepted submissions from the region (Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia and Delaware). He also had an environmental focus. It was a beautiful regional journal.

We, on the other hand, accept submissions from all over the globe. In our last issues, we have published writers from Australia, Taiwan, Canada and the U.S. We don’t have a thematic focus—instead we strive for a combination of styles and content, ranging from formal poetry to free verse to traditional narrative to experimental fiction. We also try very hard to represent a variety of writers, balancing the number of men and women and including people of color.

Jan:   How did you get involved in this publication, taking on the role of Editor-in-Chief?
Julie:   In 2004 The Potomac Review was housed in name only at Montgomery College. None of the faculty or students were participating at all. I volunteered to re-shape it to include faculty as editors and students as interns. In fact, the Potomac Review internship is one of the coolest things I get to do. We select a team of the best, brightest, most eager creative writing students and teach them the publication business from the inside. I have an incredible supportive Dean and Vice President above me.

Jan:   Although the guidelines and deadlines are online, what kinds of work are you most interested in publishing at this time?
 Julie:   We are on the prowl for more excellent nonfiction. I, personally, like magic realism, but any story has to go through our three-tier system, so it’s not just a matter of what I like.

Jan:   What kinds of mistakes do you most often see in submissions that are deal-breakers for you and your section editors? What advice do you offer to those submitting work for publication consideration?
PotomacReviewJulie:   Mistakes in writing and in submitting can be deal-breakers. The funniest one occurs when a writer submits in the wrong genre. If a poet clicks fiction or a fiction writer selects poetry, the submission often gets lost in a “no-man-nobody’s-reading-it-land.” A big mistake in writing is a weak opening line or paragraph. A huge deal breaker is forgetting to tell us if the piece has been accepted somewhere else, leaving us wasting our time. That mistake usually puts the writer on our black list. And yes, editors can block writers from submitting.

Jan:   Tell us a bit about the annual Potomac Review‘s involvement in the F. Scott Fitzgerald Conference.
Julie:   We are involved with Barrelhouse Magazine in the lively one day “Conversations and Connections: practice advice on getting published.” Dave Housley, Susan Muaddi Darraj and I founded the conference in 2007 and it keeps rocking on. We are launching a new variation of it this January with a one day craft-intensive event at Montgomery College. We are no longer involved with the F. Scott Fitz Literary Festival.

Jan:   What are the joys and sorrows that you’ve discovered about working for a small literary journal? What is the best advice you have received, and what advice have you chosen to ignore about editing a literary journal?
Julie:   The joy of hearing that somebody loved something we published or the joy of meeting an author in person whose work we loved makes it worthwhile. I was at AWP and this guy walked up to our book fair table. I saw his name badge and called out “Coyotes”! Will Donnelly! Then  I had a great chat about how much we loved his work and how pleased he was with Potomac Review. We’ve had some incredible success stories. Jennine Capo Crucet—I heard her read at Breadloaf in 2008, published her in 2009, she won the Iowa Review Prize in 2010. Stories and essays we adored have been recognized in the Best American series. We haven’t cracked the Pushcart yet, but we hope to soon. For me,  joy comes with success for our authors.
The advice I ignored was from David Lynn of The Kenyon Review. We were having a casual chat at Sewanee in 2005 and when I asked his advice about editing a lit mag — he said, “Don’t.”

Jan:   What is the most useful thing that you have learned about your own writing as a result of working with the Potomac Review?
Julie:   Hmm, good question. I’ve learned about having patience with editors and I’ve gained a much greater understanding that any editor is only one reader on any given day. Another editor tomorrow may love a story or have room for it.

Jan:   What are you working on in your own writing right now?
Julie:   A new novel is out in circulation even as I type. Next up for me is to polish my novella, Challenges of Non-native Species, and to prepare my African short stories collection.
Breadloaf 
Jan:   In August you returned to the Breadloaf Conference once again; please tell us about your experiences there. What new things did you discover about your own writing?
Julie:    Ursula Hegi, who is amazing, taught me a lot about point of entry into fiction. Andrea Barrett gave an incredible craft talk on Point of View.  And as for my own writing? Breadloaf is so much fun but it also gave me a nice shot of confidence in my work. It is a competitive admission conference and being there makes a writer feel good. Being surrounded by other serious and talented writers leads to marvelous conversations about the writing life, too.

Jan:   What question do you wish I had asked? And what would you say in response to it?
Julie:    My question–Why don’t editors respond immediately to writers? And I’d answer this way: Try to respect that each issue is also an artifact, an object of literary art and it takes time and care to do it, if not perfectly, at least as polished as possible. Editors are people, too, usually with demanding teaching jobs, so be patient.

Jan:   Finally, thanks so much, Julie for taking time for this interview. Please provide readers with the Mission Statement of the Potomac Review and relevant links.

Potomac Review opens windows into the complexity of literature: in each issue, our selections span the spectrum of voice and style. We sample realistic and experimental prose and poetry. Drawing 95 % of our content from unsolicited submissions, we publish writers at all stages of their careers. Every issue includes work by emerging and by established writers. The Potomac Review features award-winning writers and has been recognized in the Best American series.  Our philosophy welcomes variety, and through it, we create an organic flow of ideas to contribute to the literary conversation.
Potomac Review no longer accepts paper submissions. Instead, submit your work electronically via our Online Submission Manager. 

About Jan Bowman
Winner of the 2011 Roanoke Review Fiction Award, Jan’s stories have been nominated for Pushcart Prizes, Best American Short Stories, and a Pen/O’Henry award.  Glimmer Train named a story as Honorable Mention in the November 2012 Short Story Awards for New Writers. Her stories have been finalists for the 2013 Broad River Review RASH Award for Fiction, 2013 finalists in the Phoebe Fiction Contest, 2012 “So To Speak” Fiction Contest.
P5080027Her fiction has appeared in numerous publications including, Roanoke Review, Big Muddy, The Broadkill Review, Third Wednesday, Minimus, Buffalo Spree (97), Folio, The Potomac Review, Musings, Potato Eyes and others.   She is working on two collections of short stories while shopping for a publisher for a completed story collection, Mermaids & Other Stories. She has nonfiction publications in Atticus Review, Trajectory and Pen-in-Hand. She writes a weekly blog of “Reflections” on the writing life and posts regular interviews with writers and publishers. Learn more at: www.janbowmanwriter.com

Friday, June 6, 2014

Entry # 216 - "Online Journals Are The Future"

Small online journals are a growing trend nationwide. As costs associated with print journals continue to increase, online journals that feature a range of online work: poetry, fiction, nonfiction, humor, podcasts, music, art and videos are the future. Although there are hundreds out there looking for new writers and interesting materials, two such journals that have distinctive styles are examples of this trend: The Atticus Review (east) and A River and Sound Review (west).


Dan Cafaro, Editor & Publisher, and Zoe Henry, Managing Editor of Atticus Review produce an interesting cutting edge weekly journal.  http://www.atticusreview.org

And a river & sound review  Founder, Mgr. Editor, Humor Editor & Live Show Host, Jay Bates and Poetry Editor & President of Operations, Michael Schmeltzer produce a journal that features irregular live podcasts and remind one of A Prairie Home Companion on steroids.    
www.riverandsoundreview.org
http://www.riverandsoundreview.org/Staff/Whoswho.htm



My recent interview with Michael Schmeltzer and Jay Bates appears this week in the weekly interview section of Atticus Review.  
http://atticusreview.org/dogs-of-glory-and-reading-for-pleasure-an-interview-with-jay-bates-and-michael-schmeltzer/

While Michael and Jay's responses are edgy, funny, even over the top, they are entertaining. Check it out. Tell them I sent you. Feel free to comment and even send some of your best work to them. The worst you could get is a "no".

Jay Bates (Founder, Managing Editor, Humor Editor & Live Show Host) grew up an innocent in Puyallup, WA during the 1970s and '80s.  He was so innocent that when a girl asked him in the 8th grade if he was a he was a virgin, he said, "No, I'm a Taurus."  As a grown up, he teaches English and writes fiction, humor and sub-par doggerel poetry.  Beyond that, he has been known to use a Sharpie to correct the language on the "Ten items or less" signs found at the grocery store. He still makes his home in Puyallup with his wife, son, daughter, and dog, a yellow Labrador retriever named Ulysses. His work has appeared in The Southeast Review.

Michael Schmeltzer (Poetry Editor & President of Operations) is ready to rumble. Some journals publish his poems (Natural Bridge, Mid-American Review, etc.), many others do not (you'll come around Georgia Review). Most recently he has placed in contests held by Bellingham Review, Water~Stone Review, and Third Coast.  His honors include four Pushcart Prize nominations, the Gulf Stream Award for Poetry, Blue Earth Review’s Flash Fiction Prize, and the Artsmith Literary Award. If you want him to like you, mention any of the following: The Hunger Games, cosplay, writer/director Darren Aronofsky, Final Fantasy, Silent Hill, or simply call him pretty; he's vain like that.   
 ===================

Looking for Superman in Scotland - Jan Bowman -2013
About Jan Bowman

Winner of the 2011 Roanoke Review Fiction Award, Jan's stories have been nominated for Pushcart Prizes, Best American Short Stories, and a Pen/O’Henry award.  Glimmer Train named a recent story as Honorable Mention in the November 2012 Short Story Awards for New Writers.



A recent story was a finalist for the 2013 Broad River Review RASH Award for Fiction, another story was a 2013 finalist in the Phoebe Fiction Contest; another was a 2012 finalist in the “So To Speak” Fiction Contest.  Jan’s fiction has appeared in numerous publications including, Roanoke Review, Big Muddy, The Broadkill Review, Third Wednesday, Minimus, Buffalo Spree (97), Folio, The Potomac Review, Musings, Potato Eyes and others.   She is working on two collections of short stories while shopping for a publisher for a completed story collection, Mermaids & Other Stories.  She has nonfiction publications in Trajectory and Pen-in-Hand. She writes a weekly blog of “Reflections” on the writing life and posts regular interviews with writers and publishers.   Learn more at: www.janbowmanwriter.com or  visit blog:  http://janbowmanwriter.blogspot.com










Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Entry # 139 - WRITERS TALK - Wilson Wyatt, publisher, editor, author, photographer


Wilson Wyatt
Wilson Wyatt, Jr. is a published writer and photographer. He is best known regionally for his supportive roles within the writers’ community on the Delmarva Peninsula. He is active in the Eastern Shore Writers Association, where he was a past president, and he is a former coordinator of ESWA’s Bay to Ocean Writers Conference. He is also a founder of The Delmarva Review, published by ESWA as a literary journal open to the new work of all writers. The Review is now in its fifth printing. Wilson’s photography has been exhibited in galleries regionally and in Phoenix, Arizona. He writes a blog: Writing & Photography – the Art of Words and Images, at http://wilsonwyattjr.com.
Issue 5 - Delmarva Review

Jan:    Thank you for taking the time from your busy schedule to talk about your work as a writer, publisher and photographer. As one of the founders of The Delmarva Review, your influence is well established among Maryland writers.  What was the impetus to begin a new literary journal in Maryland five years ago?

Wilson:   The Eastern Shore Writers Association wanted to produce a legitimate literary journal that would showcase the best writing of authors from the region and beyond. I use the word “beyond,” because the Review is open to all writers, everywhere, which assures its standing among other fine literary journals. About 70 percent of the writers are from the greater region. In all, over five years, we have published new prose and poetry from 116 authors, from 21 states, the District of Columbia, and seven foreign countries. Submissions are competitive, as expected for a journal with high quality standards. The result is that publication represents a literary achievement for the selected writers. That is a significant opportunity. The published prose and poetry of 24 authors have been nominated for the prestigious Pushcart Prize.

Another purpose of the Review is to inspire inquisitive writers. Each piece our editors select can become an excellent example of writing to study for its craft and how it achieves “memorability” with readers.

Jan:    What was your involvement in the start-up process and what is your role now?

Wilson:    I am humbled by my peers, and I humorously refer to myself as an “instigator” and an organizer. I’m always amazed at the incredible talent of so many people I meet in the writing community. When you look at those who have been active volunteers with The Delmarva Review, it is obvious that the publication’s success is due to their talents…as poets, writers, critics, designers, and editors. My role has been to engage them in this effort, to develop the Review into a quality publication of literary writing. My current role is executive editor, but the editorial board members share equally in the work and success. We’re all volunteers. We do what we do to encourage other writers and contribute to the literary community. That’s important.

Jan:    What kinds of work are you looking for when you, and the talented Delmarva staff of volunteers, sift though the stories, poems, and essays that are submitted?

Wilson:     We encourage great story-telling and moving poetry. Our standards are for “memorable” prose and poetry that exhibit skillful expression. Each submission is read by more than one reader, which minimizes the subjective nature of selection. Of course, we’re limited in how much good work we can publish in a single issue. Our best advice is for writers to read selections from past issues before submitting. The Delmarva Review is available to order from the website, www.delmarvareview.com, or in a digital Kindle edition from Amazon.

Jan:    You’ve written and given talks about the state of publishing today.  In your opinion, what is ‘honest and true’ and essential to know about publishing today?

Wilson:    It’s a great time to be a writer. Thanks to digital technology there are more authors, more publication services, and more books being published than ever before. “Self-publishing” is now an accepted practice, even for established authors, and it competes head-to-head with traditional publishing. This is a permanent sea change. That’s the good news.

Jan:    What is really happening in the ‘publishing’ and ‘self-publishing’ industries?  Can you talk about it from a writer’s perspective?

Wilson:    What writers need to know is that the quality of their work must appeal to a much more competitive market of readers. It has to be good, in the eyes of readers. Ultimately, the best test for a book’s success is one word, “sales.” Regardless of genre, the volume of sales will determine the success of a book. You can win contests, get excellent reviews, use all kinds of promotional devices, and advertise your book, but the common denominator of success will always be sales, and repeat sales, from readers. A good book will help sell the next one. Building a following of readers is the author’s gold mine. With few exceptions, success is built upon the substance of the book.

I emphasize this because in this new world when anyone can become a published author overnight, many writers may think their work can somehow achieve success merely by being published. They can become disillusioned quickly when there are no readers and sales.

There are reasons for this, but the biggest one is that the substance and quality of the work does not meet the reader’s expectations. Since the marketplace is now being flooded with new books, especially eBooks, the quality of the work must stand out. Quality writing is more important than ever before, in every genre.

Jan:    What are the benefits and problems associated with social media for writers?

Wilson:    The greatest benefit of social media is that it can alert a huge worldwide audience of your work, if done properly. That’s amazing! The biggest problem, however, is that most people promote their work without regard to the original purpose of the social medium. They treat it like typical advertising media, and it’s not. It’s “social,” not “commercial.” The misuse of social media is far more prevalent than its accepted use and purpose.

The leviathan of social media is Facebook. However, if one thinks they can simply post the title of their book on Facebook, telling a billion people to buy it, they will be in for a great disappointment. People joined to connect with other people, for many reasons, but not to be sold anything.

Anyone wishing to use social media (Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google+, LinkedIn, Pinterest, blogs, etc.) should take the time to use or study each one. They are all different, and new ones will develop. Understand them, first. Like in any marketing activity, a little homework goes a long way. Knowing the medium is essential to using it successfully.

Personally, I think social media can be a powerful, complimentary piece of a much greater marketing effort, especially for books. If you accept my premise that the greatest promoter of a book is the reader, then a good marketing effort should begin with knowing why a reader would want your book. Identify your reader.  

Jan:    What do you see as the changing role of agents? Will agents be needed in the future?

Wilson:    While most agents are still wedded to traditional publishing, that is bound to change with the marketplace. A good agent can be helpful with legal issues involving contracts and future rights. Some will be a helpful bridge to many small publishers, or to the film and broadcast industries. An agent can become a good “manager” for a book project. As long as they know the marketplace, it’s likely they will have a better future than the big publishers. The agent’s role is still evolving.

Jan:    What factors are helping to establish the legitimacy of self-publishing?

Wilson:    Technology and numbers. Publishing is a business. Digital publishing, especially POD (print-on-demand), has totally changed the economics of publishing, giving authors the opportunity for more lucrative sales, with little risk. Simultaneously, the Internet is now providing the means for powerful mass marketing tools worldwide, thanks in large part to Amazon and Google. By example, in 2012, the first multi-million-dollar contract with a major publisher was turned down by a popular author who decided to self-publish his best-selling novels. Add to that the advent of eBooks and digital readers, and suddenly self-publishing is far more acceptable and growing rapidly.

Ultimately, the reader will decide the legitimacy of authors through sales volume. The gatekeeper will be the marketplace. The former gatekeeper role of traditional publishers is diminishing. However, as suggested earlier in this interview, the reader will become more and more discerning and selective, as more and more books flood the market.

Sunrise at Thomas Point - Wilson Wyatt
There will always be a market for good writing.

Jan:    Congratulations on your beautiful photograph, “Sunrise at Thomas Point Lighthouse,” winner of Nikon’s Mentor Series “Best of Maryland” photography competition.  Your award winning photographs are among the most recognized and admired photographs of Maryland landmarks around the Chesapeake Bay region. What advice can you offer to photographers seeking to “click” the right moment?

Sunrise Tapestry - Wilson Wyatt
Wilson:    Beauty attracts the eyes of everyone. The Chesapeake Bay region, from the Bay to the ocean, is a constantly changing landscape of natural beauty, from sunrise to sunset. No wonder it attracts so many photographers and artists. Many are outstanding and inspiring.

I am constantly studying and learning photography. Like with other artistic endeavors, including writing, the more we do it, the better we are at our craft.

A big lesson I’ve learned in photography is to take lots of images and to be fearless. Light is always changing, even on a still landscape. I am not satisfied with a single shot. Catch the changing light with many images. I tell myself, I may never be at this spot or see this scene again.

In my photo that won the Mentor Series Best of Maryland competition, I joined a number of experienced photographers shooting Thomas Point Lighthouse. We were on a moving boat, just before sunrise. Everyone wanted to catch the sunrise. Out of the corner of my eye, I noticed a cruise ship approaching on the right and a tanker on the left. The beacon of the lighthouse was revolving, and the sun started peaking above the lighthouse. Each was in motion. I kept shooting until all of these elements came together, filling my lens. Out of many shots, there were only two that captured the ultimate scene. I wanted more than just another sunrise over the lighthouse.

Jan:    Tell me about your favorite photo adventure as you’ve participated in the Mentor Series Worldwide Photo Treks sponsored by Nikon and Popular Photography magazine. What did you photograph?

Blue-Footed Booby & Chicks -

Wilson:    I learn a great deal from mentors, and I try to mentor others, as well. The “Mentor Series,” guided by at least two Nikon professionals, is one of several great photography programs. I’ve also joined other photography treks in Yosemite, Alaska, and the Galapagos Islands. 

Photos by Wilson Wyatt - Galapagos Islands

Pelican in Flight -
While constantly learning on treks with other experienced photographers, the best ones are hard work. Yosemite involved eight miles of hiking every day, on difficult terrain, but it was worth it. My favorite was a week in the Galapagos Islands several years ago. That was an opportunity of a lifetime. I’d like to repeat it. Knowledge and practice improves us over time.


Jan:    If a great picture tells a story, which of yours provides the richest narrative?

Wilson:     I took a photo of a young couple in Yosemite who had ventured  “off trail,” standing on the edge of a granite boulder hanging 3,000 feet above Yosemite Valley. It was a precarious, dangerous scene. The image showed the young man looking in one direction, over the edge, while the young woman was looking back toward the trail, as if wanting to return to safe ground. It showed danger, fearlessness, and fear, simultaneously…from two different perspectives. I actually felt dizzy taking the photo. A writer could create an intriguing story from the image, but the photo told its own.

Yosemite - Catching the Light
Jan:    Your book, “Yosemite: Catching the Light,” is a collection of 75 color images taken in Yosemite Valley and wilderness in early June 2011. You’ve dedicated the book to your son, Wilson Wyatt III, a professional photographer in Phoenix, Arizona.  Published as a collector’s limited edition, you offered it to those who have an interest in fine art, photography and nature.    What are you working on now?

Wilson:   I’m completing a new limited edition book, “Chesapeake Views, Catching the light,” which will be published this spring. It is a collection of photographic images taken around the Chesapeake region, on land and water. In addition to “catching the light” and creating a feel for the region, I am including photographic data on how some of the images were taken. This may appeal to many enthusiasts who want to enjoy photography as a hobby. I always want to know how a photographer takes an interesting shot.

Jan:    Thank you for taking the time for this interview, Wilson. I have admired your photography and appreciate the fact that you are a legend among photographers and writers here in Maryland.  What advice would you share with aspiring writers and photographers about nurturing the creative process?

Yosemite Valley - Wilson Wyatt
Wilson:    For me, life is a journey, not a destination. Even in silence, the muse is always with us. All we need to do is take the time to listen carefully, look around us with an inquisitive eye, absorb the beauty, and put our imagery on paper. Learn as much as we can from others, with humility, but always be willing to offer a helping hand. Creativity and inspiration are not passive endeavors.  
On the Edge - Wilson Wyatt

      Yosemite - photos by Wilson Wyatt
To obtain a copy of  “Yosemite: Catching the Light,” or his new book, “Chesapeake Views, Catching the light,” contact Wilson Wyatt, Jr. directly for a signed copy.  Email:  wwwtwo@earthlink.net

============================================

About Jan Bowman
-->
Jan Bowman’s work has appeared in Roanoke Review, Big Muddy, Broadkill Review, Trajectory, Third Wednesday, Minimus, Buffalo Spree (97), Folio, The Potomac Review, Musings, Potato Eyes, and others. She won the 2011 Roanoke Review Prize for Fiction.  Glimmer Train nominated a story as an Honorable Mention in the November 2012 Short Story Award for New Writers. Her stories have been nominated for two Pushcart Prizes, two O’Henry Awards and Best American Short Stories. A story was a finalist in the “So To Speak” Fiction Contest. She is working on two collections of short stories and currently shopping for a publisher for a completed story collection. Her nonfiction work appears in Pen-in-Hand and Trajectory. She writes a weekly blog of “Reflections” on the writing life and posts regular interviews with writers, editors and publishers.   Learn more at:



Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Entry # 133 - Laurence W. Thomas Interview - Poet & Publisher for Third Wednesday Literary Journal



Laurence W. Thomas has published books of poetry, fiction, humor, and creative nonfiction.  His poetry has appeared in Blue Unicorn, Third Coast, The Antioch Review, Third Wednesday, 5 AM, The Midwest Review, The Dan River Review, The Bridge, and many other publications.  He lectures annually at the Lucidity Poets’ Retreat in Eureka Springs, Arkansas, and is founder and editor of Third Wednesday, a literary arts magazine. His recent poetry collection A Bird in the Stone is available (online order) from The Last Automat Press.
Jan:    Thank you for taking the time from your busy schedule to talk about your wonderful literary arts magazine, Third Wednesday, published by Gravity Presses (lest we all float away) Inc.  How did Third Wednesday come into existence? And tell us about the name. 

L.W. T.    In 2005, a group of writers began meeting at Barnes & Noble (and later at Borders Books) on the third Wednesday of each month.  Two years later, it looked as if getting together regularly was becoming difficult so I suggested resurrecting an earlier magazine, Now Here Nowhere, edited by Mike Barney, and call it Third Wednesday.   

Jan:    How did you go about assembling your staff?  Do you have much turnover?

L.W. T.    Most of the regulars at our meetings jumped on the bandwagon.  Janann Dawkins, Todd Maddocks, Sophie Grillet, Carl Fanning, Joe Ferrari, Paul Kingston, each came with individual skills and interests.  At that time, we all knew each other.  Later, other friends joined as some of the original group wandered off.  Alex Cigale, a University of Michigan friend living in New York, joined.  He is now teaching in Tajikistan and reports from there via the Internet. 

Robert Fanning and Ken Meisel were associates for several years and are now pursuing other careers full-time.  Josie Kearns, writing professor at University of Michigan, remained with us for a couple of years.  Lisa Rye, after several years as associate editor, is on leave to concentrate on personal matters.  I met Philip Dacey through the Internet and he has judged our annual contest for three years and is an associate editor at TW.  He introduced me to Karla Huston from Wisconsin who joined us as associate editor.  George Dila agreed to become fiction editor, and Judy Jacobs became art editor after Sophie left.  Of the original group, Carl Fanning, Joe Ferrari, Paul Kingston, and I still remain.   

Jan:    What sets Third Wednesday apart from other similar publications?

L.W. T.    I can’t speak for other publications, but a couple of words come to mind in answer to the question: balance and diversity plus, possibly, clarity.  All creative effort is experimental which we recognize and encourage so long as what we accept is not too avant-garde nor too lacking in originality.  Our editors are diverse, coming from academia, the professional world, and with wide experience in writing and publishing.  Each has an equal say in what is accepted or rejected.  We look for a balance between formal, i.e. sonnets, villanelles, etc., and free verse.  We try to include some light verse, some poetry and fiction of sterner stuff, artwork that demands attention, nature poetry along with love and other human concerns.   

I’m sure all publications are ‘reader conscious’ or mindful of what the market demands.  I know that our editors are ever-mindful of what readers want which is borne out by the letters of appreciation we receive.  We are always on the lookout for ideas expressed in new, fresh ways. Also, TW pays its writers.  It isn’t much – $3 to $5 per item – but it gives our authors a feeling of being professional.      

Jan:    What is Third Wednesday’s involvement in The InsideOut Literary Arts Project?

L.W. T.    One of TW’s aims is to find new voices, and where better to look than amongst our younger writers?  The InsideOut Literary Arts Project goes into Detroit schools and develops skills of expression, teaches the do’s and don’ts of good writing, and inculcates in young people the satisfaction of self-expression and publication.  I can think of no greater way to encourage a future in good literature than to invest in our youth in this way.  TW receives consistently favorable input for our InsideOut Feature.   

Jan: Third Wednesday has another feature: Featured Poet.  How is this poet selected?

L.W. T.    The Featured Poet sends in 6 or 8 poems and a brief statement about the poems or whatever the FP wants to say.  The poems are not edited and are not forwarded to the associate editors.  I find poets whose work stands out who I feel our readers should know better.  They can be well known in the world of poetry or newcomers.  Their selection is subjective and somewhat arbitrary, so nobody need apply. 

Jan:    What are you looking for in the stories and poems you select for publication?

L.W. T.    Your question omits our artwork which is important to us.  Judy Jacobs, art editor, complains that she receives too few submissions.  We need black and white pictures that reproduce well in all media, but we also need the occasional color one for the cover.  Our web site goes into this in greater detail.  

The appeal to the senses is part of the picture in writing as well, a picture which steps out of its frame and gives more than it shows.  “Show, don’t tell” may have worn thin, but works well for us if it’s properly understood and applied.  Readers must find direct involvement in what’s being shown, not just told about it.    

As for fiction, George Dila, fiction editor, says, “I want to know who is involved and what’s at stake right away. Another way of putting this is – I need to know ASAP why I should give a damn about this at all.”  His excellent essay appears on our web site.  One problem is that most short stories are much longer than our 1,500 word limit.       

We are looking for meaningful work by experienced writers and artists.  ‘Experienced’ implies basic skills, not necessarily wide publication.  We hope to discover new voices on their way to becoming recognized and established. 
          
Another answer to the question is that we are looking for work that will sell.  TW depends – financially -- on subscribers and a few generous benefactors.  We would welcome more of both.      
          
Ultimately, we look for beauty.  Beauty is so subjective, but with poetry and fiction and artwork, it comes down to beauty of expression, meanings, emotions, and a general handling of the media, in other words, that which we deem to be, well, beautiful.

Jan:    Most of the published selections in Third Wednesday are poetry. Is this the focus for the journal or is this due to other factors?

L.W. T.    We have one fiction editor, one art editor, and six poetry editors, and maybe that tilts the scales. Submissions for poetry arrive every day; the fiction and art editors scramble about soliciting material.  We would like our focus to be on all three.      

Jan:    Tell us about your poetry contest.

L.W. T.    THIRD WEDNESDAY ANNUAL CONTEST:  Send up to three unpublished poems with an entry fee of $10.  Each poem should not exceed two pages. The top three winners receive $50 each, and their poems appear in Third Wednesday.  Other entries will be considered for publication.  Mail poems, SASE, and check to: Third Wednesday Poetry Contest, 174 Greenside Up, Ypsilanti, MI, 48197.  Deadline: the last week of January. 


Jan:    What are the basic submissions guidelines that writers must follow in order to be considered for Third Wednesday?

L.W. T.     Check our web site.  What it doesn’t mention are things that should always be followed by experienced writers.  All writers should have someone to proof-read their work.  Typographical and spelling errors can usually be sorted out, but they tell us something about the author.  We do not accept submissions sent through the mail (except for our annual contest which must be handled through the USPS). 
                 

Jan:    What do you often wish you could whisper softly in the ear of aspiring writers who submit work to Third Wednesday?

L.W. T.    Study the works of other writers, from Third Wednesday, of course, but from all such literary journals and publications.  Find writers on your wave length and learn from them.  Don’t copy, but utilize what you like and make it your own.  W. H. Auden once said to me, “Be honest.”  It took me a while to know what he meant.

Jan:    What is the most difficult part of being Third Wednesday’s Editor?

L.W. T.  That’s easy: the details.  It’s astounding the number of little steps it takes to get a submission from receipt to publication (or rejection). 

Jan:    What inspires you?  AND What makes your day as Editor?

L.W. T.    That’s two separate questions.  My day is made if I manage to keep up with the magazine’s demands.  When I get through a pile of work, or at least a satisfactory amount, my day is made.  Finding an uplifting manuscript is inspiring.  Having it rejected by the other editors is not.    

Jan:    Which literary journals do you read regularly?

L.W. T.    Blue Unicorn from Kensington, California, is a beautiful collection of poetry I’ve been reading (and have been published in) for years.  I subscribe, off and on, to many literary magazines, too many to list.  Is Poets & Writers a literary journal?  I advertise in it and like its coverage of the contemporary scene.   

Jan:    Tell us about your own writing and publications. What are you working on right now?

L.W. T.    When I returned from teaching in Uganda, Costa Rica, and Saudi Arabia, I collected the poetry I’d written and published my first book, Pursuits, in 1986.  Since then, I’ve published 10 books of poetry, essay, humor, and creative nonfiction plus any number of chapbooks.  Man’s Wolf to Man, poems of war and man’s inhumanity, is a favorite, along with Homage to Carl Rakosi and The Autobiography of William Shakespeare.  Among my best chapbooks are Moment of Comfort, The Bird in the Stone, and Beyond the Bridge.
          
I have several manuscripts looking for publishers (A Walk with Charles Bukowski and Spindrift) and am just completing a small collection of poems about a niece and nephew I love and their beautiful home in northern Michigan.  

Jan:    What is the most useful advice you’ve received as a writer and editor?

L.W. T.    Don’t quit your day job.

 Jan:   And what advice have you chosen to ignore?

L.W. T.  Don’t quit your day job. 

Thank you for taking the time for this interview.  Please tell readers how to subscribe or donate to Third Wednesday and/or The InsideOut Project. 
Third Wednesday subscriptions ($30 a year) or donations to:
Third Wednesday
174 Greenside Up
Ypsilanti, MI, 48197

Third Wednesday website: thirdwednesday.org
Submissions email address: submissions@thirdwednesday.org
Fiction Editor’s email address: georgedila@chartermi.net
Art Editor’s email address: jejacobs@comcast.net

InsideOut Project’s email address: info@insideoutdetroit.org

An Editor's View


            A literary magazine like Third Wednesday attempts to establish and maintain a balance between what is being written – and read – today and what anticipates changes in creative expression.  Acceptability is a matter of satisfying literary tastes, present and future, and our editors always have an eye on what readers enjoy today as well as tomorrow.  And enjoyment, in its broadest sense, is what poetry, fiction, and artwork are all about. 

            Variety is important to balance, variety of subject matter, the backgrounds and experience of those who submit works to TW, those who edit what we receive, and those who read the magazine.  Our policy is to present works of a serious nature offset by some humor, the more formal styles counterbalanced by those of individual invention, pieces that reflect the human condition from a personal viewpoint to those that make more objective observations. 

            At Third Wednesday, our hope is that we include many ‘new voices’ on their way to greater publishing success.  Our editors are always looking out for undiscovered talent, writers and artists who deserve greater exposure than they may have already found.  Of course, we are pleased to welcome works by experienced writers, those who have many books to their credit, whose names are well known already.  We hope to balance our books by presenting both.  

====================
Jan Bowman's work has appeared in Roanoke Review, Big Muddy, Broadkill Review, Folio, The Potomac Review, Trajectory, Third Wednesday, and many other journals. A recent story was an Honorable Mention in Glimmer Train's November 2012 Short Story Award for New Writers. She won the 2011 Roanoke Review Prize for Fiction, and her work has been nominated for two Pushcart Prizes, two Best American Short Stories, and a PEN/O. Henry Prize. She is working on two short story collections and seeking a publisher for a third collection.  Learn more at www.janbowmanwriter.com