Previously (see Entry # 179), I
wrote about caterpillars (larvae) in my garden that grow up to become (chrysalis or pupa) and then Monarch
Butterflies. Here in Maryland, September and October marks the last chance for a
fourth generation of caterpillars to form pupa for a couple of weeks, before
they turn into fully formed Monarch Butterflies, stretch their wings, eat a
snack, and fly off to Mexico ahead of the heavy frosts. Caterpillars and
butterflies that fail to complete the cycle and escape to more welcoming
climates will die.
During October, I watched
five caterpillars as they evolved in my backyard herb garden. All moved on except for this little guy. Sadly, he or she is the only one
to remain. It is a procrastinator. While the others have gone on their way, this
one seems content to munch on juicy parsley. It seems quite relaxed – at least
as much as I can tell – and he or she will die without ever going through the
complete cycle. No trip to sunny Mexico for this one. "He" is a serious procrastinator, and doesn't want to fly.
Flight does have risks, but remaining earthbound too long also brings a limited future for this caterpillar. And - I have been thinking about nature in this context – and of how writers tend to procrastinate. But I wonder. "Can planned procrastination be useful?"
Flight does have risks, but remaining earthbound too long also brings a limited future for this caterpillar. And - I have been thinking about nature in this context – and of how writers tend to procrastinate. But I wonder. "Can planned procrastination be useful?"
In Roy Peter Clark’s book, Writing Tools: 50 Essential Strategies for Every Writer, Clark notes that almost all writers procrastinate, and while we tend to think that it is a vice, rather than a virtue, he raises the possibility that writers might do well to explore ways to turn delays into something constructive, rather than destructive. Clark says, “What if we found a new name for procrastination? What if we called it rehearsal?”
If we did, we would need to seriously engage in mindful thought.
Clark suggests that good
writing and effective revision requires a process of mental preparation.
Through a series of rehearsals, the mind tries out ideas, it explores and
discards (often reluctantly) the excess that will never find its way to a final
destination – as a finished novel, story, or essay.
Perhaps, it is as Clark says. "There is a Zen-like quality to the wisdom of periods of inaction." And shaping work into form requires a time of mental rehearsal. "The writer must not write in order to write. To write quickly, you must write slowly. To write with your hands, you must write in your head." (Unless you are a caterpillar...)
============================================
Jan Bowman’s fiction has appeared in
numerous publications including, Roanoke Review, Big Muddy, The Broadkill Review, Third Wednesday, Minimus, Buffalo
Spree (97), Folio, The Potomac Review, Musings, Potato Eyes and others. Glimmer
Train named a recent story as Honorable Mention in the November 2012 Short
Story Awards for New Writers. Winner of the 2011 Roanoke Review Fiction Award,
her stories have been nominated for Pushcart
Prizes, Best American Short Stories, a Pen/O’Henry award and a recent story
was a finalist in the 2013 Phoebe Fiction Contest; another
was a 2012 finalist in the “So To Speak” Fiction Contest. She is working on two collections of short stories while shopping
for a publisher for a completed story collection. She has nonfiction publications
in Trajectory
and Pen-in-Hand.
She writes a weekly blog of “Reflections” on the writing life
and posts regular interviews with writers and publishers. Learn more at www.janbowmanwriter.com or
visit blog: http://janbowmanwriter.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment